Does this example make more sense?
I was confused in the `tog` example as to why one would `tog` the `NAVI` layer when in the `NAVI` layer.
This commit is contained in:
parent
768fc4a5e5
commit
b8863881da
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ Example:
|
|||
|
||||
nav_layer {
|
||||
bindings = <
|
||||
&tog NAVI &kp KP_DIVIDE &kp KP_MULTIPLY &kp KP_MINUS
|
||||
&tog DEFAULT &kp KP_DIVIDE &kp KP_MULTIPLY &kp KP_MINUS
|
||||
&kp HOME &kp UP &kp PAGE_UP &kp KP_PLUS
|
||||
&kp LEFT &none &kp RIGHT &kp KP_PLUS
|
||||
&kp END &kp DOWN &kp PAGE_DOWN &kp RETURN
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue