Added current best under leet code

README.md

@@ -17,3 +17,7 @@ and failed submissions of previously flawed solutions.
 ## Status 
 
 This solution passes the submission
+
+Current best on leet code with the commit 4def379400ba1fafda214249cedde3c4606a5f02
+
+![current_best_on_leet_code](./pics/current_best_on_leet_code.png)

src/lib.rs

@@ -8,62 +8,55 @@ impl Solution {
         Solution::idiom_can_jump(&nums)
     }
 
-    ///
-    /// ## Mapping elements to nodes in a graph
-    /// Every index is viewed as a node in a graph.
-    /// The value of a node (value of the element in the array)
-    /// is the number of edges to subsequent successors.
-    ///
-    /// ### Example
-    /// Given the first element in \[3,2,1,0,4\]
-    ///                               
-    /// This element has two edges, with the second and the third elements as subsequent successors
-    ///
-    /// ## Why the mapping to a graph
-    ///
-    /// By doing so, one can skip redundant work.
-    /// Redundant work would be walking a path more than once.
-    /// Walking a path is simulating jumping from 1 to the max jump height.
-    /// Path walking checks if any jump height from a certain index will reach the last index.
-    /// Every simulated jump height serves as a next start point for new path walking if this starting
-    /// point was not tried before
+    /// Returns true if the last element can be reached
+    /// by starting with the 0th element in accordance to the rules of the jump game.
+    /// Link to the description of this code challenge.
+    /// https://leetcode.com/problems/jump-game/description/
+    /// Source code of this solution is hosted on:
+    /// https://git.kb-one.de/boolpurist/jump_game_challenge_solution/src/branch/main/src/lib.rs
     pub fn idiom_can_jump(nums: &[i32]) -> bool {
         if nums.is_empty() {
             return false;
         }
+        // parameter can not be empty at this point
         let target_val = (nums.len() - 1) as i32;
         // Using a dequeue ensures that every index is visited
-        let mut next_nodes = VecDeque::from([(0, nums[0])]);
-        // index visited yet
-        let mut greatest_visited_indices = -1;
-        if Self::check_with_target_value(target_val, 0) {
-            return true;
-        }
-        while let Some(next_node) = next_nodes.pop_front() {
-            let (index, steps) = next_node;
-            let max_jump_height = index + steps;
-            if Self::check_with_target_value(target_val, max_jump_height) {
+        // Reason: This algorithm finds every index in an ascending order.
+        // Dequeue acts here as a queue preserving the ascending order in which the indices are
+        // found
+        let mut next_nodes = VecDeque::from([0]);
+        // This index and all previous ones are visited already
+        let mut greatest_visited_index = 0;
+        while let Some(next_index) = next_nodes.pop_front() {
+            // Indexing with a next_index greater than the length
+            // of parameter nums will not happen
+            // Reason: the values for next_index greater than len of nums
+            // are not used for indexing because the check for reaching the last index
+            // is done before using next_index for indexing
+            let jump_height = nums[next_index as usize];
+            let max_jump_height = next_index + jump_height;
+            let found_end_of_seq = target_val <= max_jump_height;
+            if found_end_of_seq {
                 return true;
             }
             // Going left to right and using a dequeue for FIFO access,
             // all indices are visited
-            let start_point = greatest_visited_indices + 1;
-            // It can start at greatest_visited_indices + 1 because the every index was checked
-            // in previous iterations.
+            let not_visited = greatest_visited_index + 1;
+            // It can start at greatest_visited_indices + 1 because the every index was inpected
+            // in a previous iterations.
             // If the max_jump_height is lower than the start_point
             // then there is not new index to be discovered
-            for to_add in start_point..=max_jump_height {
-                if to_add > greatest_visited_indices {
-                    next_nodes.push_back((to_add, nums[to_add as usize]));
-                    greatest_visited_indices = to_add;
-                }
+            let last_unvisited = max_jump_height + 1;
+            // This loops grantees that every reachable index is visited and only once
+            // in the worst case scenario
+            // This leads to a linear time complexity for comparison done by Self::check_with_target_value
+            for to_inspect_later in not_visited..last_unvisited {
+                next_nodes.push_back(to_inspect_later);
+                greatest_visited_index = to_inspect_later;
             }
         }
         false
     }
-    fn check_with_target_value(target: i32, value: i32) -> bool {
-        target <= value
-    }
 }
 // Stop copying from here for submitting this solution to leet code